YubaNet.com
Friday, February 10 2012

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features features Weather features Sierra NightSky features features YubaNet Horoscope features Road Conditions features Home spacer
Op-Ed
 

Kieran Suckling: Gutting the Clean Air Act is a Senate Deal Killer
Center for Biological Statement on Climate Legislation and the Clean Air Act


       

By: Center for Biological Diversity

WASHINGTON, D.C. March 19, 2010 - In the past two days, the media have reported that Senators Kerry, Lieberman and Graham have agreed to craft a climate change bill which will ban the EPA from using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, increase oil and gas drilling (including off-shore drilling), subsidize nuclear energy, and allow atmospheric carbon dioxide to grow to catastrophic levels by not requiring economy-wide greenhouse gas emission cuts sufficient to reduce CO2 levels to 350 parts per million or less.

In response, Center for Biological Diversity Executive Director Kieran Suckling issued the following statement:

"If correctly reported, the Kerry, Lieberman, Graham approach is unacceptable. It won't stop global warming, and by attacking the Clean Air Act, it will remove the only tool we currently have that can do so.

"Kerry, Lieberman, and Graham appear to be taking Congress to a new low it its long-term failure to rise to the challenge of stopping global warming. Beginning with the inadequate Safe Climate Act of 2008, each successive bill in the House and Senate has weakened emission targets and increased fossil fuel subsidies.

"Enough is enough. Global warming legislation must do more than have the word ‘climate' in it. If the soon to be released bill mirrors its description to date, the Center will call on Senators who care about preserving a healthy human and natural environment to vote against it.

"The Clean Air Act has protected the air we breathe for 40 years, reaping economic benefits 42 times its cost. We should implement it fully today and craft climate legislation that complements, not weakens it.

"Scientists have determined that reducing carbon pollution to 350 parts per million is necessary to preserve life as we know it. 350 part per million must be the bottom line for all climate and energy policies. House and Senate members should reject all legislation that does not require greenhouse gas reductions sufficient to reduce the current atmospheric level of carbon dioxide from 387 parts per million to 350."

Website: www.biologicaldiversity.org


By submitting a comment you consent to our rules. Please use your real first and last name, not a nickname or alias. Thank you.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Latest Headlines

Op-Ed

Allison Fisher: With Japanese Nuclear Crisis Still Unfolding, New Nuclear Reactor Approval Is Move in Wrong Direction

Daryl Cagle | The New York Times Cartoon Kerfuffle

Andy Borowitz | Fact That No One Likes Him May Be Hurting Romney

Dan Smith: New Legislation Would Close Corporate Tax Loopholes, Save Taxpayers $155 billion

Robert Reich | The Sad Spectacle of Obama's Super PAC

Liz Barratt-Brown | It's all about the framing: How polls and the media misrepresent the Keystone XL [tar sands][oil] pipeline

Tina Dupuy | 'The Market' Has Chosen the Winner of the Culture Wars

James Corless: Transportation for America coalition announces opposition to House energy and transportation bill


More

 
 
 

NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar .Weather . Sierra NightSky . Horoscope . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising. About Us . Support YubaNet . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 2012
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600