YubaNet.com
Wednesday, February 8 2012

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features features Weather features Sierra NightSky features features YubaNet Horoscope features Road Conditions features Home spacer
US
 

Americans United Applauds Ninth Circuit Decision Favoring Patients' Right To Pharmacy Access


       

By: Americans United for Separation of Church and State

July 8, 2009 - Americans United today praised a federal appellate court decision that will make it more likely that women in Washington state have access to emergency contraceptives from their local pharmacies.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a lower court was wrong when it blocked a Washington state regulation requiring pharmacies to sell "Plan B" morning-after pills.

"The appeals court has done the right thing," said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. "States have every right to set policies that guarantee patients' access to medical care.

"The Religious Right and its allies have been waging war on women's access to reproductive health services," he continued. "This is one battle that they have now lost."

In 2007, the Alliance Defense Fund, a Religious Right legal group, sued on behalf of a pharmacy owner and two pharmacists. They argued that the regulation violates pharmacists' religious freedom rights, even though under the rules, a pharmacist who objects can pass the prescription on to a colleague at the same store.

After the district court ruled in favor of the pharmacists, Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, asking the appellate panel to overturn the decision, which it has done.

The 9th Circuit panel sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings but strongly suggested that the Washington state regulations are constitutional and in the best interest of the patients.

The court also said that the regulation did not unfairly single out those with religious beliefs and that requiring pharmacies to fill prescriptions in a timely manner is a neutral rule that does not target religious beliefs for negative treatment.

Website: www.au.org


By submitting a comment you consent to our rules. Please use your real first and last name, not a nickname or alias. Thank you.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Latest Headlines

US

POGO Launches Inspector General Vacancy Tracker: "Where Are All the Watchdogs?"

NARAL Pro-Choice America Calls on Congress to Back Off Attacks on Insurance Coverage of Birth Control

FFRF challenges religious shrine in Flathead National Forest

400,000 people, 573 scientists and more than 60 members of Congress urge Obama to say no to Arctic drilling

Major Mainstream Religious Leaders Support White House on Contraceptive

U.S. Teen Pregnancy Rate At Lowest Level in Nearly 40 Years

WildEarth Guardians Files Suit to End Trapping in Lobo Country

New Evidence That Chevron Used U.S. Professors to Defraud Ecuador Court In $18 Billion Environmental Lawsuit

Study: Homegrown Muslim-American terrorism minuscule threat to public safety

Final EPA toxics rule will lead to modest short term job growth, new EPI study finds


More

 
 
 

NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar .Weather . Sierra NightSky . Horoscope . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising. About Us . Support YubaNet . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 2012
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600