YubaNet.com
Wednesday, February 22 2012

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features features Weather features Sierra NightSky features features YubaNet Horoscope features Road Conditions features Home spacer
US
 

Group Releases Data on Judicial Nominations Process During First Three Years of Obama Administration


       

By: Alliance for Justice

WASHINGTON, D.C. Jan. 26, 2012 - In the wake of President Barack Obama's demand in the State of the Union address "that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days," Alliance for Justice today issued The State of the Judiciary: Judicial Nominations During the First Three Years of the Obama Presidency, a benchmark report detailing the reasons behind the current staffing crisis in the federal court system.

With over 100 vacancies currently plaguing the district and circuit courts, and almost one in nine judgeships without sitting judges, the report concludes that "Republican senators' relentless, unprecedented obstruction of judicial nominees has created the almost unimaginable possibility that by the end of the president's first term the overburdened federal courts may have more vacancies than when his presidency began."

Drawing on an in-depth analysis of data on nominees, the confirmation process, and the federal courts, the report finds that:

· During President Obama's first three years, current vacancies rose by 65% from 55 to 84. This trend stands in stark contrast to President Clinton and President Bush's first three years, when vacancies declined by 65% and 43%, respectively. [See page 13 of the report.]

· The Senate confirmed far fewer nominees—and a much lower percentage of nominees—at this point in President Obama's first term than it had for his two predecessors in office. The percentage of confirmed district court nominees is at historically low levels. [See page 12 of the report.]

· Republicans even blocked large numbers of nominees to seats that the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts had declared to be "judicial emergencies." Thirty of the 84 vacancies at the end of the third year were judicial emergencies. [See page 16 of the report.]

· Republican appointees still dominate the federal judiciary. Since the end of the Bush Administration, the percentage of Republican-appointed Circuit Court judges dropped from 61.3% to 52.2%, and the percentage of Republican-appointed District Court judges only dropped from 59.4% to 54.7%. [See page 15 of the report.]

Alliance for Justice notes that despite the obstructionist onslaught, time remains to make significant headway against the vacancy crisis this year. The president and like-minded senators can forcefully push back against Republicans' tactics and force votes on unquestionably qualified nominees. They can show the country that government can work and that justice will not be denied because of empty seats on the federal bench.

NOTE: This report focuses on comparative statistics for the first three years of President Obama's first term in office. Up-to-the-minute statistics for the current year are always available online on the Alliance for Justice's Judicial Selection page, which contains the highly regarded Judicial Selection Snapshot, as well as data on Nominees Pending on the Senate Floor, a list of Vacancies Without Nominees, and our new Judicial Selection Calendar.

Alliance for Justice is a national association of over 100 organizations, representing a broad array of groups committed to progressive values and the creation of an equitable, just, and free society. AFJ works to ensure that the federal judiciary advances core constitutional values, preserves human rights and unfettered access to the courts, and adheres to the even-handed administration of justice for all Americans. It is the leading expert on the legal framework for nonprofit advocacy efforts, providing definitive information, resources, and technical assistance that encourages organizations and their funding partners to fully exercise their right to be active participants in the democratic process. AFJ is based in Washington, D.C. Additional information can be found at www.afj.org.

 

By submitting a comment you consent to our rules. You must use your real first and last name, not a nickname or alias. A comment here is just like a letter to the editor or a post on Facebook. Thank you.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Latest Headlines

US

Waxman and Rush Call for Hearing on NOAA Data on Rising Temperatures Worldwide

AGU: Oil sands pollution comparable to a large power plant

Only One Fourth of Low- Wage Workers in America Have Employer-Provided Health Insurance

Federal agencies must protect America's Pacific Island monuments from illegal fishing now

Roberts Court rejection of code of ethics for high court is disappointing

Arctic Oil Drilling Will Pump Pollution into Pristine Skies

Save the Scenic Santa Ritas: Augusta Resource's Proposed Rosemont Mine Threatens Southern Arizona's Water

Panetta, Allen Apologize for Destruction of Religious Materials

Transportation Bill: Oil & Gas Backed House Members Pass PIONEERS Act


More

 
 
 

NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar .Weather . Sierra NightSky . Horoscope . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising. About Us . Support YubaNet . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 2012
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600